![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Off Topic Discuss anything and everything not related to WWII! |
|
Welcome to WW2 in Color History Forum ! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. If you register now you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#331
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Golden parachute eased departure of foundation president this year; charity commits `to transparency' Toronto Star Newspaper The SickKids Foundation gave former president Michael O'Mahoney a $2.7 million golden parachute when they showed him the door early this year, documents reveal.The charismatic O'Mahoney, an American headhunted six years ago to lead the charity, received a payout that included his final salary of $600,000 plus a whopping $2.1 million the charity calls "incentive payments" and money to compensate him for leaving before the end of his contract. Realizing that this payment – which is unlike any in Canadian charity history – may enrage donors, the charity has set up a special phone line for calls from the public. "This was one of the most difficult years in the history of SickKids Foundation," board chair Patsy Anderson said Wednesday. O'Mahoney did not return a call to his new office, a charity fundraising consultancy company on Queen St. E. When O'Mahoney left SickKids, he said he was going to attend divinity school and become a deacon in the Roman Catholic Church. Late Wednesday, he sent a written statement saying his deal with SickKids Foundation stated "the terms of my severance package be kept confidential." He added, though, that the $2.7 million cited by the charity in its financial statements to regulators "represents a sum far greater than the one I was offered." SickKids is the fundraising arm of the Hospital for Sick Children. Two years ago the Star reported that SickKids was using aggressive, commission-based fundraisers. The practice is frowned on in the charity world. The Star also reported on high salaries such as O'Mahoney's. At the time, Anderson stood by the president, saying he was a skilled leader who was needed for the job. His salary was $612,000 in 2007. By comparison, the president of World Vision, a charity that not only raises funds but undertakes projects worldwide, was $175,000. When interviewed, O'Mahoney defended his salary, and when asked if he received any additional incentives based on fundraising or other targets, he said he did not. According to Anderson Wednesday, O'Mahoney was getting these incentive payments – she wouldn't say how much – and they were building up. She said that's part of the reason for the $2.7 million payout. A big chunk of it is also related to a clause in his contract – approved by the board when it hired him – providing for severance pay. Anderson refused to release this contract. The hospital, she said, "seeks the best researchers. We seek the best foundation executives." In a statement Wednesday, the board said recent measures it has taken "reflect the Foundation's core values of honesty and integrity." Hired this summer to replace O'Mahoney is Ted Garrard, formerly vice-president (external) of the University of Western Ontario. Garrard told the Star Wednesday he will be paid $400,000, plus another 25 per cent of his base salary if he meets fundraising and management targets. Garrard is paid a bit less than the president of Sick Kids Hospital; O'Mahoney was paid more. This new wave of disclosure may be a sign philanthropic groups want to boost donor confidence. SickKids called the Star before it published its financial documents. "We are very committed to transparency," board chair Anderson said in an interview at the foundation's University Ave. offices. The SickKids Foundation grew under O'Mahoney, but so did its cost of fundraising. Administration and fundraising now costs 40 cents on the donor dollar, the charity said in the statement. Anderson said they are restructuring to bring those costs down. She pointed out that fundraising revenue grew significantly under O'Mahoney, more than doubling from the $45 million when he took over in 2003. But in the past year, a challenging economy has seen revenues drop to $88 million. Proof that the charity can be run more cheaply was evident over the past six months. A board member and Toronto business executive, John Francis, who ran the foundation until a full-time president could be found, did the job for free. The $2.7 million payout to O'Mahoney was a "negotiated resignation," Anderson said. As part of what she calls "restructuring costs" they also paid $800,000 to some other senior executives the charity let go. In his statement, O'Mahoney said he is proud of his achievements, which he said included raising fundraising revenues from $43 million in 2003 to $98 million in 2008.
__________________
Wiki is ok. History Channel is ok. But WW2 Forum is the BEST!
|
|
#332
|
||||
|
||||
|
Among the many (possibly infinite
Quote:
Yeah, well, I've been very closely affected by suicide in the past year and I can't see why the calendar shouldn't be published. Then again, I'm not going to respond to the invitation for anyone needing help with personal problems to call SANE, partly because I'm not likely to launch myself off my trolley because a cartoon fucking rabbit necks itself and I can't tell the difference between the cartoon fucking rabbit necking itself and a human being I love doing the same. Or maybe there's something wrong with me, that I can't see the difference between a human being and a cartoon fucking rabbit. Possibly because I am so seriously disturbed that I fail to identify myself with a cartoon fucking rabbit, unlike SANE people. Perhaps this is why I am reduced to a bit of a snigger every time everyone is reported to be offered counselling every time a newspaper reports someone causing offence by some major offence such as farting in public. Counselling and other grand interventions by people who have no fucking idea what actually happens in a so called 'critical incident' might be a waste of time, at least for everyone except the useless overpaid consultants offering it to corporations etc. But I'm just judging on the basis of my limited personal experience with some useless 'How did it make you feel' psycho dollies providing some pretty much compulsory bullshit after one mass murder event which didn't quite get off the ground, after the first murder and some other gun violence didn't quite go the way the intended mass murderer and then suicide by police cunt intended. Meanwhile, judging by media attention, the nation is supposed to get itself as wound up about blackface in a trivial event by a few kids in a school in a schoolyard nobody has ever heard of as the nation should be about a fucking cartoon rabbit in a calendar? Quote:
__________________
. . War is no pastime; it is no mere joy in daring and winning, no place for irresponsible enthusiasts. It is a serious means to a serious end, and all its colorful resemblance to a game of chance, all the vicissitudes of passion, courage, imagination, and enthusiasm it includes are merely its special characteristics. Four elements make up the climate of war: danger, exertion, uncertainty, and chance. von Clausewitz, On War Last edited by Rising Sun*; 11-02-2009 at 10:10 AM. |
|
#333
|
||||
|
||||
|
There is no telling these sorts of people anything, they are convinced they alone have the job of telling everyone else how to perceive, and respond to whatever the nutter idea of the week may be. There was a similar bleating of the Cloud 9 society here some years ago about a book, and calendar featuring (with equal parts creativity and practicality in my opinion) the manifold uses for deceased cats.
__________________
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|